Submitted by Mayor Tim Sbranti:
For the past three days, Mayors from all over the country gathered to attend dozens of workshops, task force meetings, and seminars on important topics affecting cities.
Some of the seminars that the Tri-Valley Mayors attended included sessions on economic development and job creation, water conservation, technology and innovation, creating healthy communities, fighting blight, housing and community development, the environment, education, energy, human services, transportation, communications, parks and recreational services, public safety, veterans affairs, and leadership development.
We heard from multiple Cabinet officials from the Obama Administration, state and municipal officials, along with business and community leaders on best practices that we could utilize in our own Tri-Valley region.
Yet unlike any of the other four national conferences I’ve attended, there was a very direct call to action for the U.S. Mayors related to advocacy on the issues of gun control.
In fact, Vice President Joe Biden was the keynote speaker who was personally charged by President Obama to create a plan addressing the epidemic of gun violence. In addressing the Conference for more than an hour, Biden detailed his background as a hunter and reiterated the Administration’s support of the 2nd Amendment and responsible gun ownership. He went on to characterize the Obama Administration’s gun control plan as a “sensible, responsible, holistic, and comprehensive” approach to gun violence.
During his remarks, Biden methodically outlined the highlights of the Administration’s proposals which include the following: requiring criminal background checks for all gun sales; reinstating the national assault weapons ban; restoring a 10-round limit on ammunition magazines; eliminating “cop killing” armor-piercing bullets; providing mental health services in schools; allocating funds to hire more police officers with an emphasis on additional school resource officers; instituting a federal gun trafficking statute; creating additional awareness and enforcement of existing laws; and more
comprehensive study and analysis by the Center for Disease Control on the impact of violent movies, television, and video games on behavior. California Senator Diane Feinstein, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, Philadephia Mayor Michael Nutter, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel all gave emotional addresses to the Conference in support of President Obama’s plan.
As you can imagine, there were many divergent opinions amongst the nations’ Mayors on a topic this controversial. There was generally quite a bit of support for the President’s efforts although there was quite a bit of conversation and differing opinions on the specifics, with their perspectives shaped largely based on regional differences and personal experiences.
Some Mayors from Southern and Western states lamented that the proposals were too restrictive and could infringe on individual rights and local customs where gun ownership is a proud tradition in their local communities. On the other side were Mayors from the nation’s urban areas who stated that their cities’ were plagued by daily gun violence and that sensible gun control was critical to act as a means to protect public safety. Sadly,
I also had the chance to speak with the Mayors of Blacksburg, Virginia and Aurora, Colorado, both who served during the tragic mass shootings at Virginia Tech and the movie theatre respectively. It was not hard to understand why they were such passionate proponents for Congressional action on this topic as the carnage forever changed their communities.
In addition to all of the workshops and discussion in topics like gun control, one
final point I want to highlight from the Conference was on the importance of disaster preparedness. During one of the luncheon sessions I was sitting with three Mayors from New Jersey. They all indicated that after Hurricane Sandy it took weeks to restore power in their communities and they still have received very little assistance. The Mayor of New Orleans was also at our table and recounted the incredible suffering and delayed federal response after Hurricane Katrina.
This made me think about how vulnerable we are in the Tri-Valley or anywhere else in California as we are living in the heart of “earthquake country.” It is imperative for every household to have extensive emergency supplies such as bottled water, non- perishable food, flashlights, blankets, etc. In the City of Dublin we do extensive disaster preparedness training on a regular basis and we have a coordinated response plan in place with multiple agencies. However, the reality is in the event of a true emergency the response from local, state, and/or federal government can be delayed as first responders assess and prioritize the allocation of resources, so everybody needs to be prepared.
I am proud of the fact that past lobbying efforts of the Tri-Valley Mayors secured millions of dollars in funding and initiated the creation of the East Bay Regional Communications Systems Authority (EBRCSA). EBRCSA is in the final stages of creating an integrated radio communication system with full interoperability of every public safety agenda in the entire East Bay. In the event of a future emergency, Tri- Valley residents can take some comfort in knowing that this valuable resource is one of the most advanced in the country and will definitely help with the disaster response.
Now that the U.S. Conference of Mayors has concluded, we will be gearing up for the Presidential Inauguration followed by two full days of lobbying federal officials on issues of concern in the Tri-Valley. I will look forward to giving an update in the coming days.
Did you miss Mayor Sbranti's previous guest column?
The only thing "productive" out of these conferences is probably the local tourist trade in the city that hosts them and probably the local entertainment venues and the "skin trade", perhaps.
The issues are complex and heated. Many of our vocal citizens have degenerated into slogans, one-liners, and instilling fear in others to defend their positions without educating themselves fully. Of course, the extremists on this issue even deny that Sandy Hook happened because the event does damage in furthering their cause. Without education, analysis, and thoughtful dialogue, it will be hard for our polarized nation to come up with "common sense" solutions but let's hope intelligence and knowledge will push dialogue to hammer out words and action to protect all citizens. The rate of gun violence is to the point that some well thought out action is needed for the defense of our citizens. Many thanks to those who are willing to move forward to try to save lives.
In a real disaster, after you've taken care of yourself and your family, you will see green vests. Migrate to those green vests and offer your help. There are public forums on FEMA websites that discuss many concerns CERT members have raised, even a wide ranging discussion of a complete breakdown of law and order as in the case of Katrina and whether or not CERT member should or should not be armed: http://tinyurl.com/aaeyre7
Your statement that Democrats are opposed to the second amendment is simply false.
I found that Chicago banned registering handguns in the city in 1982 and found that Chicagos' homicide rate, per 100,000 people, was 30 in 1980, 22 in 1985 and 30 in 1990. Then from 1990 to 2005 the rate fell to 15.6. In 2010 the rate was 15 when the handgun ban was overturned in July. In 2012 there was a jump in the total number of homicides from 435 in 2011 to 506 in 2012. That should put the 2012 homicide rate in the range of 18 to 19. Clearly homicides dropped from 1990 to 2010 and we'll have to see if 2012 is an outlier. The question is did it really take 8 years for the handgun ban to become effective? Since the ban did not effect previously registered handguns there would be a delay in results, but it is hard to say how long it should have been. The data that I found doesn't suggest that gun control had a negative impact on Chicago, at least when looking at overall homicide rates. In fact, the recent removal of the ban on handguns and the uptick in the murder rate may actually suggest the opposite. Sources: http://www.disastercenter.com/illinois/crime/3111.htm http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/2010/07/city-council-passes-daley-gun-restrictions-450.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Chicago
You actually think that I had these specific conclusions before I went and looked at the actual data? Let's get one thing straight, I found data and then made a conclusion, not the other way around. As a gun owner I am curious because I have heard both sides of the argument so I wanted to see what I could learn from whatever data I could find. You say that my sources are biased and that you know because you lived in Chicago which is corrupt. Where is your data backing your claim that my sources are biased? Are you assuming that the data must be biased because Chicago is corrupt?
I am neither a democrat nor republican. However, I know democrats who want to do away with the 2nd Amendment; I don't know any republicans who want to do away with it. My suggestion on proposing an amendment is that since this is such a contentious and divisive issue (according to the national press) then if an Amendment passes or fails whatever side loses needs to shut up and move on.
I am also an independent and I don't know any democrats that have proposed doing away with the second amendment all together. The issues that the national media are discussing have to do with banning certain types of guns, which the supreme court has already ruled to be constitutional. If people did attempt to do away with the 2nd amendment and failed, the government would still be allowed to limit the types of guns covered by the existing amendment and people would still exercise their freedom of speech to voice their opinions on which guns should be banned.