.
Feedback

Gun Control and Disaster Preparedness Wraps the U.S. Mayors’ Conference

Dublin Mayor Tim Sbranti's guest column from the U.S. Mayors’ Conference in Washington

Submitted by Mayor Tim Sbranti:

For the past three days, Mayors from all over the country gathered to attend dozens of workshops, task force meetings, and seminars on important topics affecting cities.

Some of the seminars that the Tri-Valley Mayors attended included sessions on economic development and job creation, water conservation, technology and innovation, creating healthy communities, fighting blight, housing and community development, the environment, education, energy, human services, transportation, communications, parks and recreational services, public safety, veterans affairs, and leadership development.

We heard from multiple Cabinet officials from the Obama Administration, state and municipal officials, along with business and community leaders on best practices that we could utilize in our own Tri-Valley region.

Yet unlike any of the other four national conferences I’ve attended, there was a very direct call to action for the U.S. Mayors related to advocacy on the issues of gun control.

In fact, Vice President Joe Biden was the keynote speaker who was personally charged by President Obama to create a plan addressing the epidemic of gun violence. In addressing the Conference for more than an hour, Biden detailed his background as a hunter and reiterated the Administration’s support of the 2nd Amendment and responsible gun ownership. He went on to characterize the Obama Administration’s gun control plan as a “sensible, responsible, holistic, and comprehensive” approach to gun violence.

During his remarks, Biden methodically outlined the highlights of the Administration’s proposals which include the following: requiring criminal background checks for all gun sales; reinstating the national assault weapons ban; restoring a 10-round limit on ammunition magazines; eliminating “cop killing” armor-piercing bullets; providing mental health services in schools; allocating funds to hire more police officers with an emphasis on additional school resource officers; instituting a federal gun trafficking statute; creating additional awareness and enforcement of existing laws; and more
comprehensive study and analysis by the Center for Disease Control on the impact of violent movies, television, and video games on behavior. California Senator Diane Feinstein, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, Philadephia Mayor Michael Nutter, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel all gave emotional addresses to the Conference in support of President Obama’s plan.

As you can imagine, there were many divergent opinions amongst the nations’ Mayors on a topic this controversial. There was generally quite a bit of support for the President’s efforts although there was quite a bit of conversation and differing opinions on the specifics, with their perspectives shaped largely based on regional differences and personal experiences.

Some Mayors from Southern and Western states lamented that the proposals were too restrictive and could infringe on individual rights and local customs where gun ownership is a proud tradition in their local communities. On the other side were Mayors from the nation’s urban areas who stated that their cities’ were plagued by daily gun violence and that sensible gun control was critical to act as a means to protect public safety. Sadly,

I also had the chance to speak with the Mayors of Blacksburg, Virginia and Aurora, Colorado, both who served during the tragic mass shootings at Virginia Tech and the movie theatre respectively. It was not hard to understand why they were such passionate proponents for Congressional action on this topic as the carnage forever changed their communities.

In addition to all of the workshops and discussion in topics like gun control, one
final point I want to highlight from the Conference was on the importance of disaster preparedness. During one of the luncheon sessions I was sitting with three Mayors from New Jersey. They all indicated that after Hurricane Sandy it took weeks to restore power in their communities and they still have received very little assistance. The Mayor of New Orleans was also at our table and recounted the incredible suffering and delayed federal response after Hurricane Katrina.

This made me think about how vulnerable we are in the Tri-Valley or anywhere else in California as we are living in the heart of “earthquake country.” It is imperative for every household to have extensive emergency supplies such as bottled water, non- perishable food, flashlights, blankets, etc. In the City of Dublin we do extensive disaster preparedness training on a regular basis and we have a coordinated response plan in place with multiple agencies. However, the reality is in the event of a true emergency the response from local, state, and/or federal government can be delayed as first responders assess and prioritize the allocation of resources, so everybody needs to be prepared.

I am proud of the fact that past lobbying efforts of the Tri-Valley Mayors secured millions of dollars in funding and initiated the creation of the East Bay Regional Communications Systems Authority (EBRCSA). EBRCSA is in the final stages of creating an integrated radio communication system with full interoperability of every public safety agenda in the entire East Bay. In the event of a future emergency, Tri- Valley residents can take some comfort in knowing that this valuable resource is one of the most advanced in the country and will definitely help with the disaster response.

Now that the U.S. Conference of Mayors has concluded, we will be gearing up for the Presidential Inauguration followed by two full days of lobbying federal officials on issues of concern in the Tri-Valley. I will look forward to giving an update in the coming days.

Did you miss Mayor Sbranti's previous guest column?

david January 19, 2013 at 09:59 pm
Sounds like productive discussions. The emergency preparedness comments make good sense too. We all need to take care of our own safety, as police and fire will be unable to handle the enormous calls for service. Don't restrict our guns to the point we law abiding people are defenseless. Having data bases so felons and mental cases can't buy them is great, but it is far from a panacea on this violence.
Dean Simpson January 20, 2013 at 03:54 am
Just look at Chicago to see what gun control does. Criminals don't care what the laws are they will get guns. Gun controls only prevent law abiding citizens from getting guns.
Californicated1 January 20, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Who's paying for this boondoggle?
The only thing "productive" out of these conferences is probably the local tourist trade in the city that hosts them and probably the local entertainment venues and the "skin trade", perhaps.
LL January 20, 2013 at 05:21 pm
So true.
JO FULLER January 20, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Kudos to some of our leadership for understanding our nation needs to unite on starting to problem-solve how to reduce an epidemic of violence. It is sad that it has taken so many tragedies to motivate the nation into some common sense action.
The issues are complex and heated. Many of our vocal citizens have degenerated into slogans, one-liners, and instilling fear in others to defend their positions without educating themselves fully. Of course, the extremists on this issue even deny that Sandy Hook happened because the event does damage in furthering their cause. Without education, analysis, and thoughtful dialogue, it will be hard for our polarized nation to come up with "common sense" solutions but let's hope intelligence and knowledge will push dialogue to hammer out words and action to protect all citizens. The rate of gun violence is to the point that some well thought out action is needed for the defense of our citizens. Many thanks to those who are willing to move forward to try to save lives.
Voter with an ID January 21, 2013 at 12:54 am
Lol, good one concerned educator. You had us going there for a minute.
John Harrington January 21, 2013 at 01:52 am
The issue here is the 2nd Amendment. Since Democrats are opposed to that Amendment and most people in the country are Democrats, why not get rid of it. Then there is no more argument. All it takes is 2/3 vote of Congress and 38 state legislatures to agree. Can't get 2/3 vote in Congress, then get 2/3 of States to call for a constitutional convention and then have 3/4 of state legislatures approve what the convention proposes (which may be more than doing away with the 2nd Amendment).
Rich Buckley January 21, 2013 at 01:38 pm
The Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department has for many months provided disaster preparedness training, CERT, Community Emergency Response Teams. These are the volunteers in green vests who arrive on scene when public disaster response agencies are overwhelmed.  The humanitarian goal embodied in CERT members is to save as many lives as possible. They are trained in assessment, triage, emergency medical organizing, light search and rescue, incident command organization, and putting out small trash-can size non-hazardous materials fires.
In a real disaster, after you've taken care of yourself and your family, you will see green vests. Migrate to those green vests and offer your help. There are public forums on FEMA websites that discuss many concerns CERT members have raised, even a wide ranging discussion of a complete breakdown of law and order as in the case of Katrina and whether or not CERT member should or should not be armed: http://tinyurl.com/aaeyre7
LL January 21, 2013 at 06:22 pm
You need to get out more.
Chris January 22, 2013 at 06:13 pm
The issue here is that people want to limit the types of guns that individuals can own. The supreme court has already ruled that the types of arms can be limited. note that the DC handgun ban was overturned due to handguns being the prevelent form of self protection. In this case supreme court also ruled that limitations could be placed on the guns outside the home, but not inside the home.
Your statement that Democrats are opposed to the second amendment is simply false.
Chris January 22, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Could you please provide evidence of your conclusion?
I found that Chicago banned registering handguns in the city in 1982 and found that Chicagos' homicide rate, per 100,000 people, was 30 in 1980, 22 in 1985 and 30 in 1990. Then from 1990 to 2005 the rate fell to 15.6. In 2010 the rate was 15 when the handgun ban was overturned in July. In 2012 there was a jump in the total number of homicides from 435 in 2011 to 506 in 2012. That should put the 2012 homicide rate in the range of 18 to 19. Clearly homicides dropped from 1990 to 2010 and we'll have to see if 2012 is an outlier. The question is did it really take 8 years for the handgun ban to become effective? Since the ban did not effect previously registered handguns there would be a delay in results, but it is hard to say how long it should have been. The data that I found doesn't suggest that gun control had a negative impact on Chicago, at least when looking at overall homicide rates. In fact, the recent removal of the ban on handguns and the uptick in the murder rate may actually suggest the opposite. Sources: http://www.disastercenter.com/illinois/crime/3111.htm http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/2010/07/city-council-passes-daley-gun-restrictions-450.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Chicago
LL January 22, 2013 at 08:49 pm
Chris, I like the fact you were eager to get data to support your conclusions but your sources are not reliable in fact they are bias. I know, I lived in Chicago, the most corrupt town in America. Although, now it's probably DC.
Chris January 22, 2013 at 09:36 pm
LL, here is my conclusion quoted from above, "The data that I found doesn't suggest that gun control had a negative impact on Chicago, at least when looking at overall homicide rates. In fact, the recent removal of the ban on handguns and the uptick in the murder rate may actually suggest the opposite."
You actually think that I had these specific conclusions before I went and looked at the actual data? Let's get one thing straight, I found data and then made a conclusion, not the other way around. As a gun owner I am curious because I have heard both sides of the argument so I wanted to see what I could learn from whatever data I could find. You say that my sources are biased and that you know because you lived in Chicago which is corrupt. Where is your data backing your claim that my sources are biased? Are you assuming that the data must be biased because Chicago is corrupt?
John Harrington January 23, 2013 at 01:33 am
@Chris,
I am neither a democrat nor republican. However, I know democrats who want to do away with the 2nd Amendment; I don't know any republicans who want to do away with it. My suggestion on proposing an amendment is that since this is such a contentious and divisive issue (according to the national press) then if an Amendment passes or fails whatever side loses needs to shut up and move on.
Chris January 23, 2013 at 02:43 pm
John,
I am also an independent and I don't know any democrats that have proposed doing away with the second amendment all together. The issues that the national media are discussing have to do with banning certain types of guns, which the supreme court has already ruled to be constitutional. If people did attempt to do away with the 2nd amendment and failed, the government would still be allowed to limit the types of guns covered by the existing amendment and people would still exercise their freedom of speech to voice their opinions on which guns should be banned.
LL January 26, 2013 at 10:58 pm
Chris, All data is corrupt or has the potential of being corrupt. And most statistical data is often never accurate. I would not base an opinion on data. Data is often used to make a point. You have to go beyond data in order to draw conclusions. You can almost always prove anything using data. That's all I'm saying. PHD and experience tells me so.
Rich Buckley January 26, 2013 at 11:48 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaPni5O2YyI&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dublin Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Smithman June 6, 2013 at 09:10 am
Also Family and Friends will gather at Georgie's home following the service to celebrate her life.
Camaro on Cinderblocks June 7, 2013 at 03:47 pm
How about creating new freeways and wider lane freeways. Freeway parking lots causes the crap air.Read More There shouldn't even be a Bay Area Air Quality Management District. That money should go to expanding highways.
It's a simple body wrap that helps shrink your fat cells.  You can do it in the comfort of your own home!
Rosielina June 6, 2013 at 09:13 am
I'm also looking for college students, stay at home mom/dads, or anyone who would love to earn extraRead More cash! Ask me how. It's simple and easy to start your own business!
Rosielina June 7, 2013 at 06:11 am
Follow my Happy Slimming blog and you will be entered in the Wrap me up FREE drawing!!!