New congressman Eric Swalwell isn't waiting long to jump into an issue that is sure to bring him some heat.
The Dublin Democrat plans to co-sponsor a bill that places restrictions on private ownership of assault weapons.
It's the first bill Swalwell will put his name on. That legislation is expected to be introduced by mid-January.
It'll come just weeks after Swalwell and other members of the 113th Congress took their oath of office. It also is one of many politically charged issues the new representatives will debate.
Among them are the debt ceiling, aid for Hurricane Sandy victims and Swalwell's idea to set up a "mobile Congress."
Swalwell may have some influence on these and other issues. On Monday, he was named by Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer as assistant whip.
What do you think about all these issues? Use the comments section to let your elected representatives how you'd like them to vote.
Swalwell will also be writing an occasional blog about his experiences in Washington.
Swalwell officially got down to business on Thursday when he and other members got sworn in. They first took the oath as a group on the House floor in the morning and then that afternoon got to individually take the oath again at a re-enactment with House Speaker John Boehner.
Swalwell said both ceremonies provoked different emotions. The House floor vote overwhelmed because as he looked around and saw 435 hands in the air, he realized the importance of the moment.
"I got hit by a semi-truck of emotions," said the 32-year-old congressman. "It was the realization we are designated with leading the country. It's a big responsibility."
The re-enactment had a different feel. He was surrounded by his parents, other family members, friends and constituents.
"That ceremony made me realize how many people it took to get this done," said Swalwell.
The new congressman was also appointed to the Homeland Security Committee and the Science and Technology Committee.
His first vote was in a losing cause. Swalwell joined other Democrats in casting their ballot for Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) for Speaker of the House. Boehner won re-election to that post.
Disarray in Congress
Last week, Democrats watched as Republicans fought internal battles over the speakership, fiscal cliff legislation and spending cuts. Some pundits are saying the Republican House members are in more disarray than ever.
"I think what we're seeing is far right extremists taking over the (Republican) caucus," said Swalwell.
That split showed up again when the House voted Friday on a relief package for Hurricane Sandy victims.
The original bill was for $60 billion in assistance, but some Republicans balked because they felt corresponding spending cuts should be made elsewhere.
The House ended up approving a $9.7 billion aid package for federal flood insurance participants on a 354-67 vote. All the "no" votes were Republicans. The remaining $51 billion is scheduled for discussion on Jan. 15.
Swalwell voted in favor of Friday's bill and will vote "yes" on the $51 billion package, too.
He said it's the federal government's duty to help victims of natural disasters, no matter where they occur.
"We come together in these situations and it's usually bi-partisan," said Swalwell. "We have to assume there will be a need for San Francisco earthquake relief some day."
Assault Weapons Ban
The next major issue is expected to be assault weapon restrictions.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein is promising to introduce such a bill in the Senate. Swalwell says he will co-sponsor a House bill on the same topic.
Swalwell says as an Alameda County prosecutor he saw the impact assault weapons have on their victims. It's not just the number and size of the bullets, he says, it's the velocity at which they travel.
"When a person gets hit by assault weapons ammunition, they have no chance," he said. "There is no reason for civilians to carry military-style assault weapons."
Swalwell said he isn't afraid of the political heat he's bound to take from the National Rifle Association and Second Amendment fundamentalists.
"I'm more worried about people who become victims of gun violence," he said.
Swalwell also supports reforming the nation's mental health system and strengthening security at schools.
Debt Ceiling
Within 60 days, Congress will once again square off over the federal government's debt ceiling.
Swalwell plans to vote to raise that limit. He agrees with President Obama that this is for expenses the government has already rang up and we have an obligation to pay them.
However, after the vote, Swalwell said Congress needs to get serious about spending cuts, so the ceiling issue is no longer a factor.
"It's incremental government. We can't keep kicking the can down the road," he said.
Once option Swalwell wants to explore is raising the cap on Social Security tax payments. Right now, Social Security taxes are collected only on the first $110,000 a person earns. After that, no tax is paid.
Swalwell says that's a "regressive tax" and the cap should be raised to bring in more revenue for Social Security.
Mobile Congress
An idea being floated by Swalwell is to make the House more of a "mobile Congress."
With the technology available today, Swalwell says there is no reason to require Congressional representative to be physically present to conduct business.
He said members should be able to video conference and telecommute, so they can spend more time in their districts.
He wants to try the idea at the committee level first, then see if it can work on the House as a whole.
"The goal is to make Congress more accessible," he said. "It's time. It's the 21st century."
So you are correct, I don't support much of the proposed legislation because it won't make our schools safer and won't reduce violent crime. Instead it pushs forward an old tired political agenda. If you thought they were really interested in preventing shootings like that in Connecticut, they would wait until the investigation was wrapped up and a final analysis was available. The information in the media regarding the guns actually used in the shooting has been all over the place. We seem more interested capitalizing on the emotional response to the shooting that getting actual data about the shooting. So please explain how background checks, ammo reporting, registering so called "assault rifles, and limiting the round count of magazine would have prevented the Connecticut tragedy. Or, the one in Colorado.
The other thought is that many law-abiding gun owners go through several background checks a year in the course of buying and selling guns. If you add ammo on top of that, that is even more background checks. This is an unreasonable burden for the law-abiding gun owner since he/she will most likely be paying for those checks. All that in addition to $200/"assault weapon" to register them. How much money do you want to suck out of law-abiding gun owners? Especially considering the marginal effectiveness.
http://news.yahoo.com/no-charges-nbc-host-over-ammunition-magazine-215152419.html
Also, if your position on arming the populace is to address your question: "What will we use to fight for our freedom" . Who are we fighting? It sounds to me that your platform is arming individuals without restrictions and implementing laws to restore moral responsibility. Is this what you beleive is "common sense thinking"?
That said, I'd like to help you get elected this time around. Please let me know the best way to reach you. Thanks.
In competition, you shoot four rounds of trap for 100 birds. Different shoots will set up a day differently but in is not uncommon to have 3 events for each day. They might shoot 100 singles (16 yards), 100 handicap, and 50 pair of doubles. Some shooters will shoot a round or two to warm up for even more targets. Here is a flyer of a local upcoming trap shoot that is a one day shoot: http://www.lprg.org/pdf_files/LPRG_ATA_20130127.pdf Many shoots will go over multiple days. Two, three and four day shoots are not uncommon. Here is an example of a three day shoot. The shooters shooting all the event in this shoot would shoot 900 rounds. Including practice rounds, they would probably exceed 1000 rounds. www.cooncreektrap.com/pdf/2009-september-5-6-7.pdf
http://www.combatfocusshooting.com/calendar/view/533
I strongly encourage all people on both sides if this debate and those part of this discussion to visit this website, especially Mr. Swalwell. http://www.assaultweapon.info/
http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/last-post-john-noveske-made-his-facebook-page-he-was-killed Addresses the over prescription of psychiatric drugs. I can't attest 100% to the validity of the post but I did Google some of the names listed and it did pan out true. Maybe the large pharmaceutical lobby $$$$ in Washington will have a say in how far the politicians look into this as a contributing factor to today's problems????? How about it Mr. Swalwell?
Eric, I'm excited you're jumping in and working on issues your real supporters care about instead of waiting to test the waters. Congratulations on your appointment to be assistant whip! Eloise Hamann
Eric, I'm excited you're jumping in and working on issues your real supporters care about instead of waiting to test the waters. Congratulations on your appointment to be assistant whip! Eloise Hamann
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGaDAThOHhA&feature=player_detailpage